Is Google’s ‘Nasty’ New Technology Secretly Tracking Your iPhone
Google’s enterprise model was under attack again this week, with a “broad coalition” of privacy-oriented tech companies asking regulators to take a stand against “collecting knowledge from all websites and companies”, thereby creating a “major platform”. The actors were enabled. Let their own companies abuse their positions by wishing.”
Google did not have a name, but then it was not mandatory to take the name of Google. The marketing campaign was organized by Chrome rival Vivaldi, which recently described Google’s covert new Internet surveillance as a “bad… harmful move that harms a person’s privacy”.
It’s been a difficult few months for Google as Apple seems to have eroded its means of gleaning knowledge from its billion-plus iPhone customers, with increasingly “boosting surveillance” within the crosshairs. A vivid gentle on knowledge gathering is now shining, and it’s far more difficult for its main characters to discover new places to cover.
As I’ve commented before, while Apple Vs Fb-Cook Dinner Vs Zuck- 2021 came to express the battle for privacy, it is really the philosophical standoff between Apple and Google that matters most. Sure, Fb put on its hard hat and took initial flak from Apple’s privacy labels and app monitoring transparency, though Google is just as closely impressed, its iOS apps are equally misplaced.
It’s ironic that Apple’s action has increased the value of Android customers to advertisers, no one should be mistaken. While I recommend iPhone, iPad, and Mac customers switch from Google apps to alternatives, the result isn’t that Android customers generally aren’t the same — in fact much more than Google’s accumulation of knowledge. are impressed, is that they need to take it without any thought, where the least number of people from Apple can train the enlightened alternative.
Again in March, when Google fired up its big PR machine for pushing its “privacy-first web” message, eyebrows were raised sharply. Then came FLOC—described as a “scary,” a “terrible idea,” a “bad” knowledge gathering venture. This semi-anonymous knowledge accumulation landed so badly that it has sent Google back to the drawing board.
Probably the most important point with FLOC has been Google’s decision to test the expertise on hundreds of thousands of real-life customers, without warning, without warning, an opt-in, and even without instructions. That’s how one can choose.
This has resulted in significant confusion as to who may be affected. These are generally not yet affected in Europe, where GDPR protections apply. Elsewhere though, while it’s clear that Chrome customers on PCs, Chromebooks and Android units are at risk, what about Apple’s additional locked-down ecosystem? Researchers have discovered fragments of FLOC logic in Chrome iOS binaries; So, are you in danger from FLOC in your iPhone?
However, it is not all good news. Google advised me that “FLoC is supported on Chrome for macOS.” And many iPhone customers have Macs, where they’re more likely to run Chrome.
For these on macOS or non-Apple units, Google has added controls to disable FLoC. “At the bottom of the settings in Chrome,” it says, “you can choose to show privacy sandbox testing options, including FLOC…we will include suggestions sooner or later to provide more control and transparency. working for.”
Google’s justification for FLOC, and enrolling millions of Chrome customers in its new trial without warning, is that their precise knowledge doesn’t take away from their browser, it’s only used to hand them over to a group of like-minded customers. is done for. However, because Privacy Foyer warned, anonymity is compromised as soon as a cohort ID is linked to different identifiers, compared to an IP tackle. And while FLOC testing runs in parallel with these diabolical third-party surveillance cookies, the threat is heightened at the moment.
FLOC was the primary innovation to emerge from Google’s “Privacy Sandbox”, which it says would “introduce true privacy protections for everyone … by guaranteeing that the ecosystem could help their companies without people being monitored.” , we will be certain that the entry into free content material continues.”
A “sandbox” is a secure environment that prevents knowledge or code from leaking or breaking. The problem with Privacy Sandbox is that it’s Google’s sandbox, which we’re being advised will protect our knowledge of, erm, from Google.